First, we have the AJC reporting that Fulton County has inflated housing values for tax collection.

“Morris filed suit against the Fulton County Board of Tax Assessors, alleging the county inflated values in scores of neighborhoods by using foreclosures seizures as comparable sales. The seizures, termed credit-bid sales, represent not money changing hands, but unpaid mortgages when a bank takes over a house. He also says appraisers are disregarding valid sales and arbitrarily setting neighborhoods’ average prices.”

….

Emory University law professor Richard Freer, an expert in civil procedure, said the argument for class-action status seems reasonable in this case, so long as Morris’ circumstances are common to every other overtaxed homeowner. There’s likely to be enormous political pressure on the judge not to make a decision that could devastate the county’s finances, but it’s his job to uphold the law, Freer said.

"If the county’s cheating, the county ought to be held liable," he said. "My guess is that if the class is certified, they’re going to get out the checkbook and try to settle."

Banks (SunTrust, BofA, Regions, Wells, etc.) use deceptive transactional structures to avoid the hits to their income statements AND balance sheets that would come from marking to market. Fulton County exploits the resulting overstated housing values established by non-monetary transactions to reap inflated tax revenues.  Why is there only a civil suit over this?

At the national/federal level, we have more evidence of corrupt CEO’s making fortunes at the expense of shareholders, but with their risks underwritten by taxpayers. (The paper he references documents that the CEO’s at the 14 Too Big to Fail banks pocketed – in hard cash terms – over $2.6 billion during 2000-08. Meanwhile, their companies’ shareholders collectively lost over $400 billion in market capitalization during the same time period. We taxpayers have ponied up multiple trillions to bail out their companies via TARP, Stimulus and Federal Reserve purchases of/loans against toxic assets. Add QE I and II to that and you’ve got some real money! We also know from numerous other sources that these CEO’s knew EXACTLY what they were doing in all respects, including their procedural documentation failures that may eventually and hopefully lead to some of them being put in jail.

To top it all, $1.3 trillion dollar investment manager Bill Gross opines today on the endemic corruption infecting DC. Key quotes:

“We need a President who does more than propose “Win The Future” at annual State of the Union addresses without policy follow-up. America requires more than a makeover or a facelift. It needs a heart transplant absent the contagious antibodies of money and finance filtering through the system. It needs a Congress that cannot be bought and sold by lobbyists on K Street, whose pockets in turn are stuffed with corporate and special interest group payola. Are record corporate profits a fair price for America’s soul? A devil’s bargain more than likely.”

“To rebalance debt loads and re-equitize financial institutions that should have known better, central banks and policymakers are taking money from one class of asset holders and giving it to another. A low or negative real interest rate for an “extended period of time” is the most devilish of all policy tools. And the asset class holder that it affects, or better yet, “infects,” is the small saver and institutions such as insurance companies and pension funds that hold long-term fixed income assets. It is anyone who holds bonds with coupons that cannot keep up with inflation or the depositor in a local bank who cumulatively holds trillions of dollars in time deposits that don’t earn a real rate of interest. This is the framework that has been created by modern-day policymakers who have innovated far beyond their biblical counterparts. To put it bluntly, they are robbing savers and taking money surreptitiously from longer-term asset holders who are incorrectly measuring future inflation.”

Pervasive fraud. Until Americans demand and/or respond to leadership that takes a principled stand against this corrosive corruption, the real estate markets cannot clear the toxic assets that poison them, and the economy cannot begin to heal. We need a Chris Christie in every governor’s office, Jim DeMint and Paul Ryan disciples throughout Congress and Rudy Giuliani-like federal prosecutors in every US district attorney’s office. Meanwhile, the Barack and Michelle tragedy continues its performance at 1600 Pennsylvania.

PrimeRevenue is the key to a financially optimized supply chain.  For Buyers and Suppliers.

Our program is an innovative and unparalleled solution that brings the benefits of information technology to the financial supply chain.  Our services deliver greater working capital efficiency, cost savings, and revenue growth opportunities for both Buyers and Suppliers.

With our program, Buyers provide Suppliers with transaction visibility and payment certainty around trade payables to their Suppliers, reducing the amount of cash tied up in the order-to-cash cycle.  Our services streamline AR/AP processes, link the flow of funds to the flow of transaction data and, by creating visibility into future cash flows, give corporations access to a variety of transaction level financing options at very attractive rates.

Simply stated, PrimeRevenue helps companies do more business with less working capital.

Although apparently not a new concept (there’s a link on their website
to a fairly sophisticated vision of it in an article written in 2000),
the integrated communications and software infrastructure for implementing it are
only now reaching the maturation to support it.

On another Web sojourn, I encountered Wells Fargo’s Commercial Electronic Office (CEO), a proprietary financial portal that claims to provide "cash management, credit, international, and trust and investment services all in once place with a single sign on".  Maybe so, but my experience with banks suggest that would be something of a stretch.  (Wells had even applied bankers’ bureaucratese to the term e-commerce, turning a concise word into a mouthful of multi-syllabic mush.)  My instincts and experience with online media content tell me that a proprietary business model will not stand.  For the same underlying economic reasons that it would make no sense for Yahoo, MSN or AOL to limit their available market to that of one communications company (as in cable or telco), it would make no sense for a true financial portal to limit its market to the available market of a given depository institution (even if owned by that institution). 

This is worthy of futher "focused" Web wanderings, thought and conversation.

"the message is pretty clear to me: eventually, and probably sooner than later, someone is going to pull together all these diverse angles on telecom/internet/media/hardware/applications/chips, incorporate some hard financial and technical analysis, and build a cross-sector investment research platform incorporating realtime tools (I mean blogging, IM, video conferencing and collaboration) rather than .pdfs and spam.

There is a business model here, and whether it’s the financial media who seize upon it (Reuters and Bloomberg have the infrastructure and a lot of data, but are trapped in a walled garden mentality and put their journalists in the same sector-coverage silos that the brokers do), or the brokers (I’m skeptical, because I think they tend to be dismissive of alternative points of view, risk-averse, organized in sector and region silos, and anyway are focused on trying to kill one another), or a newcomer (CNET or something that doesn’t currently exist), I feel certain that it is going to happen."

Makes sense to me.  Furthermore, if true, it would seem to follow that almost any research-intensive business would be open to similar disruption.  Wonder if Gardener, Forrester, Yankee, et al. have thought of that?